![]() |
Ban Ki-Moon |
A child "living in poverty" seems to be a hot button issue right now, and rightly so. But how much do we let the fact that any of our students are living in poverty affect how we relate to them? How does the fact that our students are living in poverty, change the way we teach ALL of our students?
I'm just thinking out loud. We need to make sure that we put the "brush" away, and see our students as individuals, and not a statistic.
Just because they are living in poverty, it does not mean that:
- we should not have high expectations of them, and only expect minimum effort.
- their mother is an addict, Dad is absent, and no one has a job.
- they can't read, write, or do math.
- they can't make it to school most of the time.
- they are not gifted.
- there is not anyone at home who wants them to be successful.
- they will behave poorly in class.
- they should be provided with limited or non-equitable resources,
- they can't compete with other students.
- they are unable to participate in any extracurricular activities. (STEM, Mystery Skype,etc...)
- they are only capable of test prep, higher-order thinking escapes them.
- can not graduate from high school or college.
- we are better than them, that we know better than them.
- they don't want more, from their teachers, their community, their world.
- they don't dream BIG.
Living in poverty comes with many struggles, but we should still provide our students with an education they could use to escape it.
Please take a moment to listen to this TED talk by Mia Birdsong," The Story We Tell About Poverty Isn't True."
Please take a moment to listen to this TED talk by Mia Birdsong," The Story We Tell About Poverty Isn't True."


